The pursuit of ethics

This is post #1000. The hard part is deciding what not to write about. Today’s world presents plenty of material, such as yesterday’s reversal of Roe v. Wade. Who are today’s great ethicists? Where does one go to learn about ethics? The Reputational Ranking of Philosophy PhD Programs has Harvard and M.I.T. tied for 9th place. The pursuit of ethics deserves a generous share of our best and brightest.

Circa 1975, I took an interdisciplinary course in Biomedical Ethics, with students and faculty from Emory University’s Schools of Medicine, Law and Theology. One issue was who gets kidney dialysis when machines were few. A medical professor said, “The one most impactful decision for renal health in America would be for McDonalds to put less salt on their french fries.”

Among the issues we discussed were organ transplants, Karen Ann Quinlan’s case, in vitro fertilization, and Roe v. Wade. Abortion remains our most difficult biomedical issue. I agree with those who say abortion should be legal and rare. I agree with the United Methodist position on this issue, beautifully and powerfully expressed by my pastor, Stephanie York Arnold.

From “The Supreme Court’s majority and dissent opinions on Dobbs reveal a massive schism,” by Bill Chappell and Nell Clark, NPR, June 24, 2022

2 thoughts on “The pursuit of ethics”

  1. I think the Methodist church position is very well thought out. And I especially liked the female pastor’s position based upon it

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s